You need to enable JavaScript to run this app.
By Travis Yule — CEO & Founder, Full Send Funding
Published 2025-06-06 · Updated 2026-09-30
Four months in business, $10,000 a month and a business bank account are the core of the bar. Here is what a young file realistically gets, and how to strengthen it first.
In one sentence: A business can qualify at four months with $10,000 a month in revenue and a business bank account, because underwriting reads four months of statements and a younger business cannot produce them — and a young file should expect the lower end of the 80%–150% band and let a clean first cycle negotiate.
Yes. At four months in business, with $10,000 or more in monthly revenue, a business bank account, a business based in the United States and no open bankruptcy, a business qualifies for revenue-based funding here. That is the core bar, and on deals up to $2 million, 90% of complete applications that meet it are approved. An open, unresolved default on existing funding is also a decline; a settled or paid-off one is not.
One thing to be exact about, since the question says loan: what Full Send Funding funds in house is an advance, not a loan — working capital advanced against future revenue, priced as a factor on the amount funded. A loan, such as a term loan or an SBA loan, we arrange with a direct lending partner, only after talking through the options with you and only if you choose to, never through a broker, and at no fee to you. The same four-month floor applies to that application, and the loan's terms are the partner's, set out in writing before anything is signed. Everything below describes the advance.
Four months is the floor for a plain reason. Underwriting reads four months of business bank statements, and a business trading for less than four months cannot produce them. There is no credit score cut-off behind it, no business plan and no collateral requirement — it is arithmetic about how many statements exist.
The more useful question is what you can realistically get, how a young file is read differently from a seasoned one, and what it should look like before it is submitted. This article works one four-month file from its deposits to its remittance, with every input stated. If you are reading it before month four, the preparation list is the part that matters: almost everything that decides the size of a first offer is free, visible in the statements, and better fixed now than explained later.
Revenue-based underwriting reads deposits rather than financial statements. What it is looking for is a pattern rather than an event: whether money arrives repeatedly, whether the balance behaves consistently, and whether a slow week is normal or exceptional.
Two months can be one good month and one lucky one. Four months is the window we actually underwrite from, and it is what the document ask is sized to — four statements, and the deposit history inside them. The causation runs in that direction and it is worth being precise about it: the floor is not a view that businesses become safe at four months, and it is not a survival statistic. It is the number of statements the decision is built from. A business that has traded for ten weeks is not a worse business than one that has traded for four months; it is a business whose fourth statement does not exist yet, and there is no work-around inside the floor for a document that has not been produced.
Two consequences of that are easy to miss.
The clock is the account, not the paperwork. Underwriting reads what is in the statements. A company formed in the spring that opens its business account and starts depositing revenue in the summer has a statement history that starts in the summer. If the business has been trading through a personal account while the business account sat empty, the history that counts begins when the revenue starts landing in the business account. A business that has traded for years but opened its business bank account less than four months ago is a conversation rather than an automatic no, especially if there is existing revenue or a strong personal credit profile.
Four months is a floor, not a target. Longer history prices better, because each extra month is more evidence. What a month of waiting is worth to a growing business is worked through below.
Banks generally want two years, because they underwrite a different thing with different evidence: historical financial statements, tax returns, a trend across cycles. That is a reasonable standard for the money they lend at the price they lend it. It is also why a profitable, growing eighteen-month-old business is routinely turned down by a bank while being an entirely fundable proposition on cash flow.
The instruments do not change with the age of the business. The same statement read runs on a four-month file and a four-year one: average monthly revenue, deposit consistency, average daily balance, negative days, and whatever other funders are already debiting. A seasoned business sends the same four statements. What changes is what sits behind them.
For a seasoned business, the four months are a sample from a longer record: last year's statements for the same months can be volunteered to explain a season, an earlier position may have run and cleared, and the business has already come through slow periods. For a four-month business the window is the entire record, and each month in it is a quarter of everything there is. An unexplained anomaly — a large one-off deposit, a legal debit, a week with nothing in it — has nothing outside the window to show that it is unusual. That is what thin file means here: not a bad file, but one in which every data point carries more weight, in both directions. A clean overdraft record is worth more on a four-month file than on a three-year one, and so is a written explanation for the one month that looks odd.
Deposit consistency is how evenly revenue arrives month to month, as distinct from its size. The remittance is sized against the weakest normal month rather than the average, and where that switch falls is judged from the whole file rather than a fixed ratio, as the sizing method sets out: when the months sit close to the window average, the average is used; when the weakest sits far below it, the file is sized to the weakest month instead — the band is applied to that month, and so is the remittance.
Two businesses can reach the same $20,000 average in very different ways. One deposits $15,000, $18,000, $22,000 and $25,000 across its four months: the weakest month is 75% of the average, close enough that the average stands. The other deposits $9,000, $25,000, $23,000 and $23,000: the same $80,000 in total and the same $20,000 average, but the weakest month is 45% of it, far enough below that the file is sized to the $9,000 month. At the bottom of the band that is a revenue ceiling of 0.8 × $9,000, or $7,200, and the offer is the smaller of that and what the payment test allows on a month of $428.57 a day of deposits, so this file supports at most about $7,200 against the $16,000 the steadier business supports at the bottom of the band. Same revenue, same age, and less than half the money, because one month in four was weak and there is nothing else in the window to outvote it.
On a seasoned file a weak month can be set against the same months last year, which turns volatility into a documented season. A four-month business usually has no last year to show. If the business is genuinely seasonal and its window catches the trough, say so in writing and describe the shape of the year you expect, and read how seasonal files are sized before choosing when to apply; without the prior year, the question underwriting has to ask is how small the offer must be to survive the weakest month.
The first business above is the common case at four months: revenue rising as the business finds its customers. By default sizing uses the average across the window, so a business depositing $25,000 in its latest month is sized on $20,000 — the band applies to what the four months average, not to the latest month. That is not a penalty for growth; it is the window being a window. A growing business can ask to be sized on the trend instead, and should send what the statements cannot show: a signed contract, the receivables aging and the current month's deposits to date. How a growth file makes that case is set out separately.
It does mean that, while a business is still ramping, a month's wait can move the number more than owners expect. If that business's fifth month comes in at $27,000, the next four-month window runs $18,000, $22,000, $25,000 and $27,000, and the average rises from $20,000 to $23,000 — a 15% larger base for every figure that follows, without anything about the business changing except the calendar.
The other direction is read too. A most recent month well below the window average, with no explanation, is one of the reasons files are declined, because a remittance sized to the average would land on a business no longer producing it. A four-month business whose launch month was its best month should explain why before anyone has to ask.
Existing positions are other advances or facilities already drawing on the same deposits, and they are visible in the statements as recurring debits whether or not they are disclosed. On a young file they are read the same way as on any file — every existing remittance is added to the one being proposed, and the total is set against average daily deposits — but with far less context around them.
A four-month-old business that took an advance in its second month has a window that contains the funding deposit itself, which is netted out of revenue rather than counted as it, and a remittance that started partway through the window. The statements show a debit running; they cannot yet show the account carrying it to completion, because that has not happened. A freshly funded position is usually a decline for a further position here, and two positions that started close together read as a business being shopped to several funders at once, which is read as distress whatever the numbers say.
The practical rule for a young business is simple. Disclose any position you have, because an undisclosed one changes the file from a business with existing obligations to a file that is not accurate. And if you have not yet taken one, do not take one to bridge to month four: it arrives in the window as a debit on deposits that are already the thinnest the business will ever have, and whatever funding comes next lands on top of it — the start of a stack.
The published rule is 80% to 150% of average monthly revenue, from $5,000 up to $10 million. A four-month-old business should expect the lower end of that band, and should understand exactly why.
It is not scepticism about the business. It is that the offer is sized to what the account can carry, and four months of history is simply less evidence than twelve. Less evidence means a more conservative multiple — the same business at month twelve, with the same revenue and the same behaviour, will price better on identical numbers.
A four-month-old business should expect the lower end of the range. That is a function of how much evidence exists rather than a judgment about the business — the same numbers at month twelve support a higher multiple.
Our published 0.8×–1.5× sizing rule applied to $20,000 of average monthly revenue. Actual offers depend on underwriting.
At $20,000 a month the band runs from $16,000 to $30,000. The $14,000 between the bottom and the top is the range the rest of the file decides, and a four-month business should expect to start at the bottom of it.
The band is not the whole calculation. The offer is the smallest of three numbers — the revenue ceiling, the affordability cap and the program limits — and the affordability cap is usually the one that binds. It starts from the payment, not the amount: amount funded = (daily room × banking days in the term) ÷ factor rate.
Two tests set the daily room. Remittance share is combined daily remittances divided by average daily deposits: a heavy share gets a file sized down and priced, and a share the deposits cannot carry is usually declined. Days of cover is average daily balance divided by the combined daily remittance: a thin cushion sizes the offer down, and an account with almost none is declined. Neither has a published cut-off; each is judged against the whole file.
Take the growing business above: four months of deposits at $15,000, $18,000, $22,000 and $25,000, an average of $20,000, no existing position, no negative days, and an average daily balance of $1,200. It sits at the bottom of the band, so the revenue ceiling is $16,000.
Deposits per day. $20,000 across 21 banking days is $952.38 a day, and every remittance below is measured against it.
On a nine-month term. The factors here are the ones this library uses to illustrate each term; real factors are set per deal inside the published 4.5% to 45% range. The example is worked in daily figures because remittance share is measured against average daily deposits. Daily payments are available on request, but they are not our preferred payment method. At 1.28 for nine months, $16,000 carries a payback of $20,480, so the cost is $4,480 — a 28% cost of capital, which is a total cost on the amount funded and not an annual rate. Over 189 banking days the remittance is $20,480 ÷ 189, or $108.36 a day. Against $952.38 of daily deposits that is 11.4% — a normal, comfortable share. Days of cover are $1,200 ÷ $108.36, about eleven banking days, an adequate cushion for a remittance this size.
The same amount on a four-month term. A 1.20 factor on a four-month term is a 20% cost of capital — cheaper in total — so $16,000 carries a payback of $19,200. But it is collected over 84 banking days, which is $228.57 a day, and $228.57 is 24.0% of $952.38. That is a heavy share for a young account, and on the $1,200 balance it leaves about five banking days of cover, so it is shown here as the failure case. The arithmetic is not specific to this business: at the bottom of the band, a four-month term at 1.20 takes 0.8 × 1.20 ÷ 4, or 24% of average deposits, whatever the revenue. Where an account cannot carry that, what it can carry on four months comes to less than the bottom of the published band, which is how an offer can honestly land under a range the funder publishes.
The top of the band on the same nine months. $30,000 at 1.28 is a $38,400 payback and $203.17 a day, which is 21.3% of deposits and under six days of cover on the $1,200 balance — too heavy a load for this account, so on a nine-month term the arithmetic keeps this file off the top of the band.
Two readings follow. The cheapest price is not automatically the affordable one: the four-month term costs $3,200 in total against $4,480 for nine months, and it is the one the account cannot carry. And the balance matters as much as the deposits: the same file with a $500 average balance has about four and a half days of cover on the nine-month remittance, too thin a cushion to carry it, and every hundred dollars of float held in the account adds nearly a day. That float is the cheapest improvement available to a four-month business. The factor rate converter turns any factor here into its cost of capital and back, if you want to check the pairing on an offer of your own.
The evidence a first offer rests on has a gap in it that no young business can close on day one: its statements show deposits and spending, but not yet how the account behaves with a fixed debit coming out of it for months on end. Two things close that gap, and both are open to any business that keeps its account clean.
The first is time. Each month of steady deposits adds evidence, and the multiple a file supports inside the band rises with it. Suppose, purely as an illustration, that eight more months of the same behaviour moved this file from 0.8 to 1.0 of revenue. At the same $20,000 average and the same nine-month factor, that is $20,000 funded, a payback of $25,600 and a remittance of $135.45 a day — 14.2% of deposits, still a comfortable share. The cover test has to pass too: on the unchanged $1,200 balance that remittance has under nine days of cover, a thinner cushion than the $16,000 file had, so the larger amount is earned by a longer clean window and a float that grew with it.
The second is a completed cycle. Renewals are where the terms actually improve, because a renewal is priced on evidence the first advance could not have: how the account behaved with a debit running through it. A four-month business that takes a small, well-sized first advance and clears it cleanly has built the one track record no amount of revenue can substitute for.
None of this takes capital, all of it is visible in the statements, and every item is easier to fix before you apply than to explain afterwards.
One dedicated business account, receiving everything. The single highest-return step. Revenue landing in a personal account is generally not counted, so the business gets sized against an understatement of itself. If you do one thing before applying, do this one.
The account in the exact legal name. A name on the account that does not resolve to the entity behind the EIN is one of the things that stalls a file at the last step. On a young business it is also the easiest thing to get right, because there is no established account to change.
A real average daily balance. The remittance is paid out of the balance, not out of the monthly total. Leaving a float in the operating account moves the number that sizes the offer more than almost anything else you control — in the worked file above, it is the difference between a comfortable approval and a decline.
Clean overdraft history. Zero negative days across the window is worth real money at any age, and disproportionately so on a thin file where every data point carries more weight. Negative days that recur through a month are one of the reasons a file is usually declined.
Consistency over size. Twelve deposits of $1,000 read better than one deposit of $12,000, because the first is a business and the second could be anything.
No transfers dressed as revenue. Money moved in from your own savings or another of your accounts is netted out of revenue, and so are funding proceeds. It does not inflate the file; it only makes the statements harder to read.
A written explanation for anything unusual. A large one-off deposit, a slow week, a legal debit. On a four-month file there is no long history to absorb an anomaly, so supply the context yourself.
Signed contracts or recurring commitments, if you have them. They are not the underwriting basis, but a young business with contracted forward revenue is a materially different proposition, and an underwriter will read what you send.
The complete list of what is being read applies at any age — it just matters more when there is less of it.
The package is short. For working capital it is four items: four months of complete business bank statements, the completed application, a government-issued photo ID for the owner who signs, and a voided business check or a bank letter carrying the account and routing numbers. A sole proprietor running the business through a personal account does not qualify: the revenue has to run through a business bank account. Statements can be sent directly or delivered by linking the account through Plaid, whichever you prefer. The document package, item by item, covers what each proves and the specific defects that turn one into a delay.
On a four-month file three of those defects are more common than on an older one, so they are worth checking before you send anything.
Four complete statements, all pages. A statement is a numbered document, and the pages that look empty carry the balance summary and the tail of the register. A five-page PDF of a six-page statement leaves a hole in a window that has no spare months to cover it.
The right four months. The most recent four, from the business account. A young business sometimes sends the months it is proudest of, or its first month because it feels like the start of the story; the file needs the latest window.
Disclosure in the application. Any existing position, any month you know looks odd, and any contract that explains a lump. Put it in writing on the application rather than waiting to be asked, because a question left unanswered inside the decision window can become a decline by default.
If you are not sure whether a particular complication disqualifies you — a rough credit history, a settled default, a non-profit, an unusual industry — the qualification questions owners actually ask are answered one by one, and the Do I Qualify check runs the five published qualification questions in about a minute, with no credit pull.
Waiting well past the floor. Businesses that wait for month twelve to apply often do so having already missed the opportunity the money was for.
Taking the largest number offered. Every extra dollar carries a remittance for the whole term, including the slow week you have not had yet. Run it against your worst week rather than your average one. At four months, the strategic value of completing a clean cycle is far higher than the marginal value of a larger first advance.
Choosing a term by its price alone. The worked file shows why: the shortest term carries the lowest factor and the largest daily debit, and on a young account the debit is what fails first.
Stacking early. A second position at month six is the fastest way to end a promising trajectory. The mechanism is arithmetic and it is worth understanding before anyone calls you.
Shopping the file everywhere. Multiple simultaneous applications produce a pattern that costs more than the extra amount is worth, and it is often a broker creating it on your behalf without saying so.
Assuming you need collateral. Our funding is unsecured: no collateral is required on anything we fund in house.
Then the honest answer is to use the time rather than find a way around it. Everything in the preparation list above can be done in month one, and a business that does all of it arrives at month four with the strongest file a four-month business can have.
If the need genuinely cannot wait, the realistic routes are the ones that do not depend on a statement window. Personal capital is the fastest and the most common. An SBA microloan, made through a nonprofit intermediary, or a loan from a CDFI comes from mission lenders that work with early-stage businesses on their own criteria rather than a statement window. Equipment financing fits where a specific asset is the need, because the asset carries part of the risk that the missing history would otherwise have to. A business credit card can bridge small, short gaps while the business credit file is built, which takes six to twelve months and is worth starting now. And the cheapest money a young business ever gets is usually not borrowed at all: customer deposits on orders, and supplier terms negotiated as the relationship builds.
We can size and price none of those, and their terms are theirs to state. What we can say is what to be wary of: an offer to fund a business before it has the statements that show what it can carry is an offer priced without that evidence, and the first advance a business takes lands in the very window that will decide its next one.
Then this is the wrong product, and it is worth saying plainly rather than encouraging an application.
Revenue-based funding is underwritten from revenue. With no deposits there is nothing to read, and no amount of business plan substitutes for it. The same is true below $10,000 a month, where the smallest useful remittance is too large a share of deposits to be safe. The routes in the section above are the realistic ones in both cases.
Come back when there are four months of deposits.
Four months in business, $10,000 a month in revenue, a business bank account, a business based in the United States and no open bankruptcies; an open, unresolved default is also a decline, while a settled or paid-off one is fine. The package is the four items above, and statements can be sent directly or delivered through Plaid.
A soft credit pull only, a decision within 24 business hours, and, on deals up to $2 million, funding within 24 hours of approval — one to three business days end to end. Same-day funding is possible on a clean file submitted before 2pm ET. Working capital funding, which we fund in house as an advance, starts at $5,000, and a young business is usually better served by a small, well-sized first facility than a large one. A loan, where one fits, is arranged with a direct lending partner as described above. The structures themselves are set out on the merchant cash advance and revenue-based financing pages, and a business whose need is a machine or a vehicle should price equipment financing alongside them.
Apply, or see what your revenue implies first.
The range chart applies the published 0.8× to 1.5× rule to $20,000 of average monthly revenue and nothing else, and the site’s arithmetic audit recomputes it before publication. The worked file in the prose is an illustration, not a customer: four months of deposits of $15,000, $18,000, $22,000 and $25,000, 21 banking days a month, an average daily balance of $1,200 and no existing position, priced at the factors this library uses to illustrate each term — 1.20 at four months and 1.28 at nine — inside the published 4.5% to 45% cost-of-capital range, which is a total cost on the amount funded rather than an annual rate. Every derived figure is worked in the prose beside its inputs.
The remittance shares and days of cover are arithmetic on the stated inputs and the readings beside them are qualitative, because the firm publishes no cut-off for either test, or for the weakest-month and falling-revenue reasons: each is judged against the whole file. The four-month floor is the firm’s own document requirement — underwriting reads four months of bank statements — and the preparation advice is the firm’s own underwriting practice. The approval rate — 90% of complete applications that meet the firm’s requirements, on deals up to $2 million — is the firm’s own figure. No external source is cited: the options for a business under four months are described in general terms, without quoting any other lender’s terms.
Yes. Four months in business, $10,000 a month in revenue, a business bank account, a business based in the United States and no open bankruptcy is the core bar for revenue-based funding here, and on deals up to $2 million, 90% of complete applications that meet it are approved. An open, unresolved default is also a decline; a settled one does not disqualify. There is no credit score cut-off, no collateral requirement and no business plan involved. Four is the floor because underwriting reads four months of bank statements, and a business trading for less than four months cannot produce them.
Because four months of business bank statements is the document ask, and a business trading for less than four months cannot produce them. What underwriting reads in that window is a pattern rather than an event — whether deposits arrive repeatedly, whether the balance behaves consistently, and whether a slow week is normal or exceptional. Two months can be one good month and one lucky one.
Because banks underwrite a different thing with different evidence — historical financial statements, tax returns and a trend across cycles. That is a reasonable standard for the money they lend at the price they lend it, and it is also why a profitable, growing eighteen-month-old business is routinely declined by a bank while being entirely fundable on cash flow.
The lower end of the published 80%–150% band — so a business averaging $20,000 a month should think in terms of roughly $16,000 rather than $30,000. That is about the quantity of evidence rather than scepticism: the same business at month twelve, with identical revenue and behaviour, supports a higher multiple. The payment has to fit as well: over nine months at a 1.28 factor, $16,000 takes about 11.4% of that business’s deposits.
Not by default. Sizing uses the average across the four-month window, so a business depositing $15,000, $18,000, $22,000 and $25,000 is sized on $20,000 rather than on its latest $25,000. A growing business can ask to be sized on the trend, and should send what the statements cannot show — a signed contract, the receivables aging, the current month’s deposits to date. Otherwise one more month moves that window a long way: a fifth month at $27,000 would lift the average to $23,000, a 15% larger base for every figure that follows.
Because the remittance is the payback divided by fewer banking days. At $20,000 a month, $16,000 over four months at a 1.20 factor takes 24.0% of deposits, a heavy share for a young account, while nine months at 1.28 takes about 11.4%. The shorter term costs less in total and is the one the account cannot carry.
One dedicated business account receiving all revenue; a real average daily balance rather than money that passes straight through; zero negative days across the window; consistency over size, since twelve deposits of $1,000 read better than one of $12,000; a written explanation for anything unusual, because a thin file has no long history to absorb an anomaly; and any signed contracts or recurring commitments, which are not the underwriting basis but will be read.
No. Our funding is unsecured: no collateral is required on anything we fund in house. For a young business buying a machine or a vehicle, pricing equipment financing alongside the unsecured structure is worth doing; we arrange equipment financing through a direct lending partner; what we fund in house is working capital, which can pay for equipment too.
Waiting well past the floor, when four months is a genuine floor and the opportunity the money was for may not wait. Taking the largest number offered, since every extra dollar carries a remittance through a slow week you have not had yet. Choosing a term by its price alone, because the shortest term carries the largest daily debit. Stacking early — a second position at month six is the fastest way to end a promising trajectory. And shopping the file to a dozen funders at once, which creates a distress pattern that costs more than the extra amount is worth.
Not through revenue-based funding, and it is worth saying plainly rather than encouraging an application: with no deposits there is nothing to underwrite, and no business plan substitutes for that. Below $10,000 a month the realistic routes are personal capital, an SBA microloan or a CDFI, equipment financing where a specific asset is the need, or a business credit card while the business credit file is built — which takes six to twelve months and is worth starting now.
Travis Yule worked in business funding before starting Full Send Funding in 2021, and has more than five years in business funding in all. He leads the company from Middle Grove, New York, and writes about working capital from the underwriting side of the table — what the numbers actually have to say before a business gets funded.