You need to enable JavaScript to run this app.
By Travis Yule — CEO & Founder, Full Send Funding
Published 2024-09-16 · Updated 2026-09-23
Most delays are files, not decisions. Five things gathered before you start turn a three-day funding into a same-day one, and none of them costs anything.
In one sentence: Most funding delays are file problems, not underwriting problems: a complete file — full statements, matching entity details, disclosed positions with payoff figures, verified wire details and a one-sentence use — is decisioned within 24 business hours, and an incomplete one funds days later.
Most funding delays are not caused by underwriting. They are caused by files that arrive incomplete — and the fix costs nothing but twenty minutes of preparation before you start.
A complete file with a reachable owner can be decisioned within 24 business hours and, on deals up to $2 million, funded within 24 hours of approval. The same business, applying with two months of statements and a phone on voicemail, funds three days later. Nothing in underwriting changed; the file did.
1. Four months of complete business bank statements. Full PDFs as the bank issued them — every page, including the ones that are mostly blank. Not screenshots, not a summary, not a spreadsheet export, not a login for someone else to fetch them. This is the single most common cause of delay by a wide margin.
2. Your entity details, matching everywhere. Legal name, EIN, formation state and business address, consistent across the application, the bank records and public filings. A business trading under a name different from its registered one should say so up front rather than have it discovered.
3. Existing positions, with payoff figures. Every current advance or loan, the remittance, and a current payoff figure for anything you intend to retire. Request payoff letters the same morning you apply — they run on the other funder's timeline, not ours.
4. Verified banking details for the wire. Account and routing numbers for the account that will receive the funds. Verify them; a transposed digit costs a day.
5. A one-sentence answer to "what is the money for". Not because it is a test, but because it changes the structure proposed. "Materials for the Henderson job, which pays in sixty days" leads somewhere different from "working capital", and the difference is usually in your favour.
Knowing this changes what you prepare, because most of it is improvable before you apply rather than after.
The full account of what is derived from statements is worth reading before you apply, not after — most of the list is improvable inside thirty days.
Ask for what the use requires, not for the maximum the business might support.
Offers land between 80% and 150% of average monthly revenue. Asking for four times your monthly revenue does not produce a bigger offer; it produces a conversation about whether the sizing is understood. Asking for a well-reasoned amount, with a stated use, gets a file taken seriously.
Then apply the worst-week test before accepting: take the proposed remittance, set it against your worst normal week from the last year, and confirm it clears with room. Not your average week. The sizing arithmetic is written out here.
No. Neither is part of revenue-based underwriting, and preparing them is time better spent elsewhere.
What does help, where it exists, is evidence of contracted forward revenue — signed contracts, a recurring service agreement, a purchase order. It is not the underwriting basis, but it is context an underwriter will read, and it matters more on a thin file than a thick one.
None of that is effort. It is sequence, and it is the difference between funding today and funding Tuesday.
Four months in business, $10,000 a month in revenue, a business bank account — that is the qualifying bar for small business funding from us, which we fund in house as an advance; a loan, where it fits better, we arrange with a direct lending partner, only if you choose to and at no fee to you. Statements are the whole document ask, a soft credit pull only, a decision within 24 business hours and, on deals up to $2 million, funding within 24 hours of approval. Same-day funding is possible on a clean file submitted before 2pm ET.
Apply — it takes about ten minutes with the statements to hand — or call 518-312-0382 if your situation needs a conversation first.
The checklist and the ordering of what stalls a file are the firm's own intake practice, stated from the desk that receives applications; the timings are typical, not measured averages.
Four months of complete business bank statements — full PDFs as the bank issued them, every page, not screenshots or spreadsheet exports. Alongside that: entity details that match across the application and the bank records, any existing positions with payoff figures, and verified account and routing numbers for the wire. That is the whole ask.
About ten minutes with the statements to hand. The variable is not the form — it is whether the file is complete when it arrives. A complete file with a reachable owner can be decisioned within 24 business hours and, on deals up to $2 million, funded within 24 hours of approval; the same business applying with two months of statements and a phone on voicemail funds several days later.
Incomplete bank statements, by a wide margin — a missing month, missing pages, or a screenshot instead of the statement. Second is an unreachable owner: underwriting has one short question and if it takes a day to ask it, the file takes an extra day. Both are entirely within your control on the morning you apply.
No. Multiple simultaneous submissions create a pattern that reads as distress, and it costs more than the shopping gains — often without your knowledge, because a broker may be sending your file to a dozen funders. Ask any broker directly how many funders will receive it. Soft-pull pre-qualification, where offered, lets you gather genuine indications without that cost.
No. Neither is part of revenue-based underwriting and preparing them is time better spent elsewhere. What does help, where it exists, is evidence of contracted forward revenue — a signed contract, a recurring service agreement, a purchase order. It is not the underwriting basis, but it is context an underwriter will read, and it matters more on a thin file than a thick one.
What the use requires, not the maximum the business might support. Offers land between 80% and 150% of average monthly revenue, so asking for four times monthly revenue does not produce a bigger offer — it produces a conversation about whether the sizing is understood. A well-reasoned amount with a stated use gets a file taken seriously.
True monthly revenue with transfers and funding proceeds netted out; average daily balance, which most often sets the size of the offer because a remittance is paid out of the balance rather than the monthly total; deposit count and spread; negative days, especially in a monthly pattern; existing debt service; and the revenue trend across the window. Most of that list is improvable inside thirty days, which is why it is worth knowing before you apply.
Six things, all sequence rather than effort: gather statements before starting the application; apply in the morning rather than at the 2pm ET cutoff; answer the phone; disclose positions rather than leaving them to be found; request payoff letters the same morning if a position is being retired; and say what the money is for and when it is needed, which changes how the file is sequenced.
Travis Yule worked in business funding before starting Full Send Funding in 2021, and has more than five years in business funding in all. He leads the company from Middle Grove, New York, and writes about working capital from the underwriting side of the table — what the numbers actually have to say before a business gets funded.